BATTERY TERMINALS PROTECTION
- bryan young
- Offline Topic Author
- Master MGer
- Posts: 3631
- Thanks: 773
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
[size=10pt]Mark[/size]
95 MGF
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
This works fine for years, it seems to be keeping water away thats the key.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Rich in Vancouver
- Offline
- Senior MGer
- Posts: 1882
- Thanks: 666
Replied by Rich in Vancouver on topic Re: BATTERY TERMINALS PROTECTION
Posted 12 years 10 months ago #35065I also use dielectric grease having owned cars with the dreaded Lucar connectors in the past.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- bryan young
- Offline Topic Author
- Master MGer
- Posts: 3631
- Thanks: 773
Replied by bryan young on topic Re: BATTERY TERMINALS PROTECTION
Posted 12 years 10 months ago #35147The reason i started the thread was because an "EXPERT" (we all know what an expert is!!) has written a letter to the MGOC and is published in the January 2012 issue (page 43) titled Dangers of Vaseline and stating "" in particular to the danger of adding a dollop of Vaseline to battery terminals. VASELINE is a petroleum jelly and burns furiously if ignited, for example by a spark!!!!!!!
Vaseline has been the choice of thousands of mechanics for umteen years for battery terminals and i am not aware of any underbonnet fire occouring. It will burn, when the jelly is heated so much that it gives off a vapour which can then be ignited as it is the vapour that burns.
i am going to do a little experiment to see if i can ignite a dollop of the stuff on a battery terminal, and will post the results ~ if you hear a large bang call the fire brigade :evil:
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Rich in Vancouver
- Offline
- Senior MGer
- Posts: 1882
- Thanks: 666
Replied by Rich in Vancouver on topic Re: BATTERY TERMINALS PROTECTION
Posted 12 years 10 months ago #35148Having worked in an MG garage in my distant past I can say globs of grease on battery terminals is worse than a fur coat of corrosion. All it takes to remove the corrosion is a kettle full of boiling water followed by a proper terminal clean with a wire brush or some sandpaper. A smear of grease/Vaseline just tales a wipe with a rag, but too much grease is a messy waste of time to clean off..
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Rich in Vancouver
- Offline
- Senior MGer
- Posts: 1882
- Thanks: 666
Replied by Rich in Vancouver on topic Re: BATTERY TERMINALS PROTECTION
Posted 12 years 10 months ago #35171Your odds of frying some wiring due to a short is much greater.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- bryan young
- Offline Topic Author
- Master MGer
- Posts: 3631
- Thanks: 773
Replied by bryan young on topic Re: BATTERY TERMINALS PROTECTION
Posted 12 years 10 months ago #35325I am satisfied that Vaseline is NOT HIGHLY INFLAMMABLE and as far as i am concerned will continue to ues it for battery terminals and of course all of the other uses it was intended for :omg:
Thank all of you for your help and advice and i shall be writing to the "numpty" who had his letter in Enjoying MG. :whistle:
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Rich in Vancouver
- Offline
- Senior MGer
- Posts: 1882
- Thanks: 666
Replied by Rich in Vancouver on topic Re: BATTERY TERMINALS PROTECTION
Posted 12 years 10 months ago #35330That'll teach Mr. Numpty to try to pull the wool over The T-Bar Tech Experts!
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.