K-series engine history, 300bhp possibility

Replied by rough luck on topic Re: K-series engine history, 300bhp possibility

Posted 13 years 11 months ago #19582
Ha ha After seeing the new toys on yours thats what went striaght on the list as an alternative to the type R

Having said that I have a never ending list, an it seems the expensive stuff are the only bits left on it

Youtube channel of mods an track pics

http://www.youtube.com/user/busternorris?feature=mhum

Website: http://www.roughluckracing.com/ MG Rover Mobile Repairs Nationwide and Western Europe

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Replied by quicksilver on topic Re: K-series engine history, 300bhp possibility

Posted 13 years 11 months ago #19584

Ned wrote:

quicksilver wrote:

rough luck wrote: I'd be happy if I could get a reliable 225-250bhp

I think it would sort of put it in the range of the rest of the car and make it a nice balance all round



We can do that just talk to me nicely :evil:

Good Morning Quicksilver, how are you today? I trust you had a great weekend?


Thank you for your kind greeting can I assist you in something? :lol:

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Replied by quicksilver on topic Re: K-series engine history, 300bhp possibility

Posted 13 years 11 months ago #19585

Ozzy wrote: I would speak to Dave Andrews - DVAPower.com
he holds the current record for tuned K-Series engines :up

pretty sure theres no one in the UK more experienced with the K-Series...

Circa 280bhp on N/A engine...

Oz.


For sure DVA have a good rep, personally I would use John Wilcox if I wasnt building them myself

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Replied by andy1970h on topic Re: K-series engine history, 300bhp possibility

Posted 13 years 11 months ago #19591
All this kind of talk could get me into a lot of trouble thanks to a conversation I had with my wife before I got the TF.

Mrs. H. "You're not going to become a tinkerer and want to fiddle and change things on this car are you?"
Me. "No, dear, that's why I'm going to get the TF160 so it doesn't need anything."

So far it's only been little things like LED interior lights and new misting washer jets or necessary changes like the new roof but more power is so so tempting.

Back with front wheel drive and 181HP at the wheels :)

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Replied by David Aiketgate on topic Re: K-series engine history, 300bhp possibility

Posted 13 years 11 months ago #19592
Funnily, I have always been happy with the power of our mpi.:shrug:

I never want to do more than the speed limit, and scooting around country lanes with the top down doesn't need any more power than the 118bhp.

David
:shrug:

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Replied by Tigger on topic Re: K-series engine history, 300bhp possibility

Posted 13 years 11 months ago #19595

david aiketgate wrote: Funnily, I have always been happy with the power of our mpi.:shrug:

I never want to do more than the speed limit, and scooting around country lanes with the top down doesn't need any more power than the 118bhp.


Yup - and the man with the red flag runs out of puff! :woohoo:


Life is its own answer, accept it and enjoy it day by day. Live as well as possible, expect no more." - Ray Bradbury, The Martian Chronicles ...

by Tigger

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • cjj
  • Offline
  • Administrator
  • Administrator
  • The future is vented.
  • Posts: 6411
  • Thanks: 1331

Replied by cjj on topic Re: K-series engine history, 300bhp possibility

Posted 13 years 11 months ago #19596
Different things for different people I suppose. I love acceleration, not too bothered about top end though. Even the 174bhp isn't enough :)
by cjj

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Replied by David Aiketgate on topic Re: K-series engine history, 300bhp possibility

Posted 13 years 11 months ago #19599

Tigger wrote:

david aiketgate wrote: Funnily, I have always been happy with the power of our mpi.:shrug:

I never want to do more than the speed limit, and scooting around country lanes with the top down doesn't need any more power than the 118bhp.


Yup - and the man with the red flag runs out of puff! :woohoo:


Got to stop every 10 miles to stock up with Werther's originals too.:rofl:

David
:shrug:

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • cjj
  • Offline
  • Administrator
  • Administrator
  • The future is vented.
  • Posts: 6411
  • Thanks: 1331

Replied by cjj on topic Re: K-series engine history, 300bhp possibility

Posted 13 years 11 months ago #19600
You only get 10 miles to the packet? Must be something wrong there, surely.
by cjj

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Replied by David Aiketgate on topic Re: K-series engine history, 300bhp possibility

Posted 13 years 11 months ago #19603

cjj wrote: You only get 10 miles to the packet? Must be something wrong there, surely.

I share them with the guy who carries the red flag.:lol:

David
:shrug:

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • psymon
  • Offline
  • Administrator
  • Administrator
  • 2001 MGF 1.8 in MNX
  • Posts: 3694
  • Thanks: 1119

Replied by psymon on topic Re: K-series engine history, 300bhp possibility

Posted 13 years 11 months ago #19606
What to much power can lead to


by psymon
Attachments:

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Replied by rough luck on topic Re: K-series engine history, 300bhp possibility

Posted 13 years 11 months ago #19607

Psymon wrote: What to much power can lead to




Yeah I'm never giving him a lift again, he said he would chip in for fuel an never did, he just started rabbling on about small steps for man an stuff

Youtube channel of mods an track pics

http://www.youtube.com/user/busternorris?feature=mhum

Website: http://www.roughluckracing.com/ MG Rover Mobile Repairs Nationwide and Western Europe

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.651 seconds