The Spelling Police

Laz1957 wrote: Thank you Mr Fry

-20 points for me then :lol:

:bust: :lol:

David Aiketgate wrote:

dazlightyear wrote: i will keep you busy then

It's only a light hearted thing, really.
Generally, I will only correct things when the meaning is unclear. :yesnod:
Unless you're a part of the admin. team, when I am a little more severe :whistle: , especially with Simon!:rofl:

I had better watch out then, my spelling is not good and there is no "spell check" on the forum. the content is usually good but the grammar poor. :omg: :bust:

Psymon wrote: Aoccdrnig to a rscheearch at Cmabrigde Uinervtisy, it deosn't mttaer in waht oredr the ltteers in a wrod are, the olny iprmoatnt tihng is taht the frist and lsat ltteer be in the rghit pclae. The rset can be a taotl mses and you can sitll raed it wouthit porbelm. Tihs is bcuseae the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey lteter by istlef, but the wrod as a wlohe. :broon:

That was easy to read, it is almost as good as one of Daz's :coat: SORRY Daz keep writing , they are all good. :thumbsup:

Yes it does On IE7/8/9 You just need to install this first http://www.ie7pro.com/spell-checker.html

David Aiketgate wrote:

Psymon wrote: Have i missed something?

Not really. It's in response to a personal demonstration of Chris' ability,:lol: And at his own request. :yesnod:

Can I be DCI Apostrophe then?

:lol:

Certainly! Welcome to the Spelling Police (Plain Clothes Division)!

We had all better watch out :omg: :omg: this force is getting much larger :bust: