Modern technology step backs.

Modern technology step backs. was created by talkingcars

Posted 13 years 5 months ago #25156
1) Compact cameras - I recently went to replace my wifes Sony compact digi camera with another compact as it was starting to have problems with colours. Could I find one with a veiw finder? No! They all only have a screen.

Result is you can not prevent camera shake by tucking your elbows into your side.

2) Smart phones - My Nokia E7 and my wifes N8 have wireless network connection but will not store the code for our home network, it has to be entered everytime, 2 of my daughters both have Nokia C3-00 and the eldest has a Sony-Erricson, theirs all store the code! A case of a smarter phone not being so clever

3) Car head units - 3 years ago when I replaced my H/U I got one which has controls for a CD auto changer and rear inputs for 3.5 audio and usb so with an adaptor I can run an iPod or MP3 player through it.

Being old (46) I don't have an MP3, let alone iPod and most of my music is on CD so having a CD head unit is good and on long trips I can load the auto changer with loads of discs. The H/U can also read MP3 tracks from a CD so can play music I have copied from my record collection.

I have just tried buying a similar new set up for my MGF, the only H/U with an input for an auto changer I can find is a cassette player! How retro is that?

None of the new ones appear to have rear input for USB so I can't even get a stand alone hard drive and fill that with MP3 tracks without having wires trailing everywhere.

4) Banks - My wife works for a bank that was recently taken over by another, they are adopting the systems of the new bank and reverting to having pay in slips and withdrawal slips, you now have to write out your requests for the tellers to copy rather than just swiping cards and scanning cheques thus increasing the time taken, paper used and having more chance of making mistakes.

And when they introduce the other banks computer system the staff will all lose their email, both internal and external!

Do you have any examples of advancing technology being backwards?


Home to black Alfa Romeo 159 3.2 V6 Q4 ,green MGF VVC and red MG Maestro T16.

MG - the friendly marque.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • PQD44
  • Offline
  • Master MGer
  • Master MGer
  • It's only the first 100 years that are difficult
  • Posts: 4386
  • Thanks: 1269

Replied by PQD44 on topic Re: Modern technology step backs.

Posted 13 years 5 months ago #25160
F ----> TF

Take a wonderful organic curvaceous design then change the odd bit fore and aft for angular sharp lines :nonod:

(Please do not try and find me I have gone in to hiding and am also only using computers from random internet cafe shops where I remain logged on for less than a couple of mins)
by PQD44

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Replied by David Aiketgate on topic Re: Modern technology step backs.

Posted 13 years 5 months ago #25161

PQD44 wrote: F ----> TF

Take a wonderful organic curvaceous design then change the odd bit fore and aft for angular sharp lines :nonod:

(Please do not try and find me I have gone in to hiding and am also only using computers from random internet cafe shops where I remain logged on for less than a couple of mins)

:thumbsup: :whistle:

David
:shrug:

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Replied by David Aiketgate on topic Re: Modern technology step backs.

Posted 13 years 5 months ago #25162
On the subject of 'no viewfinder' compact cameras.
Most compacts now have a huge zoom facility so the standard optical viewfinder can't cope. The only alternative is a viewfinder that is actually another small screen, like most 'bridge' cameras or the SLR that still can use an optical viewfinder.

Either way a lot more money!... :pinch:

David
:shrug:

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Replied by Ruth on topic Re: Modern technology step backs.

Posted 13 years 5 months ago #25163

PQD44 wrote: F ----> TF

Take a wonderful organic curvaceous design then change the odd bit fore and aft for angular sharp lines :nonod:



I thought you were talking about the MGA and the MGB........ :whistle:
by Ruth

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Replied by talkingcars on topic Re: Modern technology step backs.

Posted 13 years 5 months ago #25166

PQD44 wrote: F ----> TF

Take a wonderful organic curvaceous design then change the odd bit fore and aft for angular sharp lines :nonod:


That only really effects the apperance, not the workings.

PQD44 wrote: (Please do not try and find me I have gone in to hiding and am also only using computers from random internet cafe shops where I remain logged on for less than a couple of mins)

Why?

David Aiketgate wrote: On the subject of 'no viewfinder' compact cameras.
Most compacts now have a huge zoom facility so the standard optical viewfinder can't cope. The only alternative is a viewfinder that is actually another small screen, like most 'bridge' cameras or the SLR that still can use an optical viewfinder.

Either way a lot more money!... :pinch:


But just with a veiw finder at least you know you are looking in the correct direction.


Home to black Alfa Romeo 159 3.2 V6 Q4 ,green MGF VVC and red MG Maestro T16.

MG - the friendly marque.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Replied by David Aiketgate on topic Re: Modern technology step backs.

Posted 13 years 5 months ago #25168

talkingcars wrote:

PQD44 wrote: F ----> TF

Take a wonderful organic curvaceous design then change the odd bit fore and aft for angular sharp lines :nonod:


That only really effects the apperance, not the workings.

PQD44 wrote: (Please do not try and find me I have gone in to hiding and am also only using computers from random internet cafe shops where I remain logged on for less than a couple of mins)

Why?

David Aiketgate wrote: On the subject of 'no viewfinder' compact cameras.
Most compacts now have a huge zoom facility so the standard optical viewfinder can't cope. The only alternative is a viewfinder that is actually another small screen, like most 'bridge' cameras or the SLR that still can use an optical viewfinder.

Either way a lot more money!... :pinch:


But just with a veiw finder at least you know you are looking in the correct direction.


True, although I've seen people photographing their nose using a viewfinder.:rofl:

David
:shrug:

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Replied by David Aiketgate on topic Re: Modern technology step backs.

Posted 13 years 5 months ago #25169

Ruth wrote:

PQD44 wrote: F ----> TF

Take a wonderful organic curvaceous design then change the odd bit fore and aft for angular sharp lines :nonod:



I thought you were talking about the MGA and the MGB........ :whistle:

Ah the MGA... beautiful!

David
:shrug:

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • cjj
  • Offline
  • Administrator
  • Administrator
  • The future is vented.
  • Posts: 6411
  • Thanks: 1331

Replied by cjj on topic Re: Modern technology step backs.

Posted 13 years 5 months ago #25209
To some maybe, in the same way as the F is beautiful to some. It takes allsorts. :unsure:

Is it me or has a certain member on here got a bit more cocky since he won his mug? :yesnod:
Last Edit:13 years 5 months ago by cjj
Last edit: 13 years 5 months ago by cjj.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Replied by Tigger on topic Re: Modern technology step backs.

Posted 13 years 5 months ago #25210

cjj wrote:
Is it me or has a certain member on here got a bit more cocky since he won his mug? :yesnod:


Know what you mean - sure it was a T-Bar Mug not an S-mug? :whistle:


Life is its own answer, accept it and enjoy it day by day. Live as well as possible, expect no more." - Ray Bradbury, The Martian Chronicles ...

by Tigger

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Replied by rog1963 on topic Re: Modern technology step backs.

Posted 13 years 5 months ago #25212

talkingcars wrote: None of the new ones appear to have rear input for USB so I can't even get a stand alone hard drive and fill that with MP3 tracks without having wires trailing everywhere.


Tsch. Hard drives are sooo yesterday. USB Memory sticks are the future.

[img

kenwood by mashthetea , on Flickr
by rog1963

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Replied by David Aiketgate on topic Re: Modern technology step backs.

Posted 13 years 5 months ago #25215

rog1963 wrote:

talkingcars wrote: None of the new ones appear to have rear input for USB so I can't even get a stand alone hard drive and fill that with MP3 tracks without having wires trailing everywhere.


Tsch. Hard drives are sooo yesterday. USB Memory sticks are the future.

[img

kenwood by mashthetea , on Flickr


Bob Seger? :broon:

David
:shrug:

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.525 seconds