Road tax - petition
My attention has just been brought to a potential intention to increase vehicle tax for vehicles such as the MGF and MGTF.
It may sound like a petition to request a reduction but sometimes that can lead to an increase instead.
There is a petition to sign if you feel opposed to the suggestion.
See https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/654884
Thoughts?
It may sound like a petition to request a reduction but sometimes that can lead to an increase instead.
There is a petition to sign if you feel opposed to the suggestion.
See https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/654884
Thoughts?
by Delbourt
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Delbourt, I wish you luck with the petition.
In context MGF VVC is 600 euro per year road fund license in Republic of Ireland.
Mat
In context MGF VVC is 600 euro per year road fund license in Republic of Ireland.
Mat
by stubbs_gt
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Notanumber
- Offline
- Qualified MGer
- Posts: 936
- Thanks: 153
is it the same as this one ?
https://www.the-t-bar.com/forum/68-the-t-bar/98824-car-tax-petition
2003 TF 135 sunstorm
by Notanumber
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
I have signed that but it's not gained much traction in the wider community. I think it much more likely that the government (any flavour) here will seek to copy the draft EU legislation covering 'End of Life' (ELV) and 'Residual' vehicles. This is legislation dressed up in environmental clothes that seeks to remove older 'less green' vehicles from the roads and make sure we all have to drive shiny new non-ICE vehicles. What it actually means is that they create aa artificially inflated (for those who can afford it) new market for volume vehicle manufacturers. My word, they can't have us all adopting the actual environmentally beneficial idea of not buying new stuff all the time and fixing or repairing older cars.
https://environment.ec.europa.eu/topics/waste-and-recycling/end-life-vehicles_en
At first, glance, the proposed legislation seems innocuous enough but the definitions make some woolly statements adaptable to almost anything. Under the definition of ELV is this sentence: Another criterion is linked to the fact that a vehicle cannot be economically reparable, i.e. that its market value is lower than the costs of the necessary repairs to restore it in a way that it can obtain a roadworthiness certificate in the Member State where it was registered.
That suggests that anything that is a economic write-off (easy for our vehicles) would not be allowed repair and must instead be deemed ELV and scrapped. There is some stuff about parts being removed for use in the repair of other vehicles but this also talks about those being traceable and controlled, meaning it will fall within the purview of specific dismantlers and not the hobbyist and you just know it will increase costs.
Although this is all relevant to the EU, I would not be at all surprised if this idea rears it's head in our parliament in the very near future. It is a market creator dressed up in fake environmental jargon.
https://environment.ec.europa.eu/topics/waste-and-recycling/end-life-vehicles_en
At first, glance, the proposed legislation seems innocuous enough but the definitions make some woolly statements adaptable to almost anything. Under the definition of ELV is this sentence: Another criterion is linked to the fact that a vehicle cannot be economically reparable, i.e. that its market value is lower than the costs of the necessary repairs to restore it in a way that it can obtain a roadworthiness certificate in the Member State where it was registered.
That suggests that anything that is a economic write-off (easy for our vehicles) would not be allowed repair and must instead be deemed ELV and scrapped. There is some stuff about parts being removed for use in the repair of other vehicles but this also talks about those being traceable and controlled, meaning it will fall within the purview of specific dismantlers and not the hobbyist and you just know it will increase costs.
Although this is all relevant to the EU, I would not be at all surprised if this idea rears it's head in our parliament in the very near future. It is a market creator dressed up in fake environmental jargon.
by SpottyCat
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Absolutely agree with Spotty Cats post above.
On a related but slightly different topic is this:
Relating to other methods coming the motorists way to force money out of you while preserving a revenue stream for the manufactures and dealers. 🤦🏻♂️
On a related but slightly different topic is this:
Relating to other methods coming the motorists way to force money out of you while preserving a revenue stream for the manufactures and dealers. 🤦🏻♂️
by MAXTHEDOG
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Airportable
- Offline
- Senior MGer
- Posts: 2111
- Thanks: 474
That video is very informative, it also answers why my cheapo reader doesn’t eradicate a fault code on my motor caravan.
I know it’s nothing to be concerned about, as I clear it & it stays away until some distant galaxies align & then it’s back, waiting to be told to clear off. And off it goes until some other cosmic incident encourages it back.
I must borrow the big code reader from my mate & do the job properly.
M
I know it’s nothing to be concerned about, as I clear it & it stays away until some distant galaxies align & then it’s back, waiting to be told to clear off. And off it goes until some other cosmic incident encourages it back.
I must borrow the big code reader from my mate & do the job properly.
M
by Airportable
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.580 seconds