Why do you need to get under the car to bleed the system?
The 6mm bleed on the water rail is accessible after removing the engine bay cover.
The rad and heater bleed points are from the front bonnet.
If you are not disturbing the hose on the engine other than at the tank why do you need to get underneath?
Read More...
It would seem that I have not described the issue properly.
One or more products in a specific formulation of Antifreeze seems to contain a particular compound that is considered as a plasticiser. I’m told that the specific compound is not present in many antifreeze/corrosion inhibitors including OAT, and that there are many producers of those products that are safe to use with silicone hoses.
As stated I’m awaiting a response from one supplier/producer to confirm that the suggested product is acceptable/safe to use (I’m as sure as I can be that it is).
What I need to know is if anyone has purchased hoses from the Chinese source identified (AliExpress) and if so with what success.
Can anyone help with that please?
Read More...
I am unable to comment on the fitting arrangement. I do not have detailed knowledge of upgrades changes etc in hose fitting configurations. As far as I am aware there was "pre PRT" and "post PRT". More than that I cant comment.
Similarly I can't comment on the materials of construction variation between models i.e. who built what where and when in the factory. Rover/China etc.
The previous response was around the use of silicone hoses and compatibility with various types of Antifreeze.
From my perspective I will seek out an antifreeze from a supplier such as Comma in future (there are others obviously) and I have no financial or technical association with Comma or any other for that matter.
There appears to be more than one type of OAT (OAT, HOAT etc) and I'm not about to get involved in that discussion on here. I am not a materials expert.
Have a look at Comma or Valvoline websites to be totally confused!
Eg Comma G30, G40, G48 in various options such as extreme etc. You need the data sheets to see what is what.
Alternatively stick with standard hoses and plug in your VRN to the search features on various manufacturers websites.
Read More...
That indeed is a suggestion based on information from one U.K. retailer. They state that a specific compound in the particular OAT is detrimental to Silicone rubber hoses.
In all probability we will never know what is included in antifreeze unless a specific question is asked of the supplier who will in turn need to ask the blender/producer.
At present it is my understanding based on a very recent phone call to x-part that the stuff I have from them on my shelf contains the undesirable compound.
But I believe Comma produce a product that is compatible. I have lodged an email request with them for confirmation. I fully expect that a phone call follow up will be required.
I would need to check to be sure but I think their ok product is G30.
Clearly if they are making more than one OAT a it is for a reason.
There will be other suppliers producing acceptable OAT products the challenge is finding the right information.
Suppliers tend to take the view that you have a standard car and that if you select a product from their list for your car it will be ok. That does not mean it is ok if you change the MOC eg to silicone hoses. It is all part of “change control”.
Read More...
An interesting collection of debris cleaned from the tank.
How did it get there? Who knows!
It is known that if certain fuel additives are not added in the correct way then precipitation can occur. By that I mean you have to add “X” to the fuel storage tank first before adding the basic petrol (in the refinery blending tanks), similarly you must add “Y” to the basic fuel in the storage tank for the same reasons.
Heaven knows what happens to fuel from different suppliers (at the pumps) if it is mixed with that from another refinery, or for that matter what happens if aftermarket additives are added.
There are many “rubber” hoses involved in conveying fuel from refinery into your car. So it is not too surprising to think that some “rubbery gloop” came out but a bit alarming never the less. What happens at garage forecourt and storage tank maintenance is another obvious place for foreign matter to enter the system.
It just shows the need for a filter in the car before it blocks the injectors!
Read More...
No idea, just came across it and that is why I’m asking the questions.
Read More...
Am I reading the above correctly that you can’t just swap out the ECU if you think it might be defective and that something else needs to changed at the same time?
If something else has to be changed at the same time can someone indicate what that might be and why please?
Read More...
Whilst searching for coolant hose kits I have come across this set. Has anyone had experience with hoses from this source please?
Quality can be a difficult thing to assess just looking a images. But when you look at the price from other potential suppliers advertising in various places this set via AliExpress is soo much cheaper. Comments please. Whilst this source might be a total disaster waiting to happen it might also be the same source used by companies advertising here in the UK.
Silicone Coolant Hose Kits For MG TF / F PRT 1.8L 18N4S1 2008 Model - AliExpress 34
Read More...
Now you understand the reasons for asking for detail in the responses.
We need some owners with 2005 cars, comfort pack cars, and the 85 to do us a favour and measure their anti roll bars.
Ideally report some other details too but that would be too demanding.
The value offered for free length is also interesting as most sources have 242 or possibly 244, the WSM I have suggests 242.
The additional length offered by the 247 recorded above would make the ride height that much greater by 5mm.
There was clearly a degree of latitude in the intended ride height or “trim height” as the WSM refers to it.
Standard front is quoted as 358 + or - 10 mm
Sports 348 + or - 10 mm.
Read More...
Hello TA22GT, was your measurement made with the bar coated/painted?
If so that likely confirms a 20 mm bar.
Read More...
No not quite.
i think that the PO fitted a different spring than standard, or a comfort spring that delivers a lower ride height by virtue of being softer.
So I think that fitting a standard spring will resolve the situation.
What I need to be sure of is that the anti roll bar fitted to the car is the right one for the standard springs, hence my question about diameter.
As to how much lower is it than standard the answer is about 20 mm i.e. an additional 10+ lower than spottpak1
Read More...
In terms of cornering ability it is better than nything I have had before, but that isn’t saying much. In terms of confidence I’d say the Renault Megan was pretty good but the ability of this TF to turn in on a corner is remarkable.
The steering issue is only noticeable when going in straight lines on good quality straight roads.
Using the kerb weight and guessing 50/50 split front to back and then across the car and comparing spring compression based on the figures from Mike Satur’s website for standard front springs (same as listed in a previous posting above) and then doing some sums I estimate that for a standard free length of spring that there is likely to be a difference in compression that equates to that lower ride height of 340mm as close as I can get it.
If someone can correct me I’d be delighted to hear from them.
If someone has the comfort pack I’d very much like to know what the distance is from the underside of the spring platform to the bolt centre, the thickness of the spring platform and any other relevant dimension such as free length of the spring or whether there is an additional packer at the top of the spring .
Read More...