Old to MG new to TF
Devoted as I am to my 1971 MGB GT I have after much consideration bought myself a 2003 MG TF - now named Izzy. Hoping for a fine summer so my wife and I can get out and about and avoid piling miles onto Yvie (the GT)
by Izzy
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Hello and welcome to the Forum.
Lot's of information and How To's as you look around.
Tell us more about your TF and what, if anything, needs doing.
Lot's of information and How To's as you look around.
Tell us more about your TF and what, if anything, needs doing.
by TA22GT
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- David Aiketgate
-
Offline
- David
-

Super Users
- mgf mk2 freestyle mpi 16" wheels, in Anthracite.
- Posts: 20627
- Thanks: 4583
Last edit: 3 weeks 5 days ago by David Aiketgate.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- judiths handyman
-
Offline
- Time served MGer
-

Site Supporter
- Posts: 456
- Thanks: 188
- Notanumber
-
Offline
- Senior MGer
-

Site Supporter
- Posts: 2375
- Thanks: 504
Welcome. A few of us here have B's
2003 MG TF 135 sunstorm
1979 MGB GT
Previously:
2002 115 TF + 1998 118 MG F
by Notanumber
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Welcome!
I have an MGB GT as well. When it comes to working on the car, you will find that the pieces on an MG TF fit together much more easily, almost like Lego - compared to aligning / fitting parts on an MGB. On the downside, some of the plastic parts seem more like single use and do no like to be assembled and reassembled too often (compared to metal parts on an MGB). Working on the engine is definitely more of a challenge due to space constraints. The handling is another level. The legroom cannot compare to an MGB. The boot is surprisingly practical for a mid engine car. Parts availability is generally good - what you cannot find new can be sourced used. They drip much less oil but the cooling system requires greater vigiligence. The springs in the boot are suprisingly similar to those used on a hatch of and MGB GT!
I have an MGB GT as well. When it comes to working on the car, you will find that the pieces on an MG TF fit together much more easily, almost like Lego - compared to aligning / fitting parts on an MGB. On the downside, some of the plastic parts seem more like single use and do no like to be assembled and reassembled too often (compared to metal parts on an MGB). Working on the engine is definitely more of a challenge due to space constraints. The handling is another level. The legroom cannot compare to an MGB. The boot is surprisingly practical for a mid engine car. Parts availability is generally good - what you cannot find new can be sourced used. They drip much less oil but the cooling system requires greater vigiligence. The springs in the boot are suprisingly similar to those used on a hatch of and MGB GT!
Last Edit:2 weeks 9 hours ago
by Goodwood
Last edit: 2 weeks 9 hours ago by Goodwood.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- sworkscooper
-
Offline
- Senior MGer
-

Registered
- Posts: 1522
- Thanks: 458
Hi and welcome to the forum. I'm sure if you enjoy your MGB , you be just as impressed with your TF.
Had mine over 10 years and I love it.
John. ( Yorkshire )
John. ( Yorkshire )
by sworkscooper
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Welcome to the Forum, lots of useful advice and help here. I have a 2002 TF135 and the advice I have had here has been invaluable. If I was in your shoes, I would fit a Low Coolant Alarm. https://www.the-t-bar.com/community/5521-brucetf135/profileDevoted as I am to my 1971 MGB GT I have after much consideration bought myself a 2003 MG TF - now named Izzy. Hoping for a fine summer so my wife and I can get out and about and avoid piling miles onto Yvie (the GT)
If the link I have posted above works, I would send a P.M. to Bruce. He sells to fellow T-Bar members a bit cheaper than via Ebay.
He puts together a neat kit which is very easily fitted. I also installed a warning-light LED into the empty socket behind the "Automatic Transmission Failure" symbol on the instrument panel. I believe that 2003 TFs will have the same panel, no Factory-fitted low-coolant hardware or wiring etc. but if I am wrong, there may be other methods of providing a low-coolant warning. The logic is that as the K series engine has a low volume of coolant in the block, and long pipes to the front rad and to the heater, by the time the temperature gauge starts to register overheating, it is already toolate to avoid HGF and engine damage.
Also Cobber provided a list of things to check to new members. His advice is excellent, so well worth alook if you can find it.
Regards
John E
Last Edit:1 week 1 day ago
by EllisoJo
Last edit: 1 week 1 day ago by Cobber.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.393 seconds